Few legal issues are more emotional or important than child custody. Whether you’re facing custody for the first time during a divorce or need to modify an existing arrangement, I understand what’s at stake, your relationship with your child.​ As an experienced Syracuse family law attorney serving clients across Central New York, I help parents navigate custody and parenting time with clarity, compassion, and strong legal advocacy.

​​

Two Types of Custody​​

In New York State, custody is divided into two types: legal custody and physical (or residential) custody, which cover different aspects of

parenting rights and responsibilities.​

 

Legal custody refers to a parent's authority to make significant decisions about their child's upbringing. These decisions typically include matters related to education, healthcare, religious practices, and other major life choices that impact the child's long-term well-being. In New York, legal custody can be structured in a few ways:

​​

• Joint Legal Custody: This is the most common arrangement, where both parents share the responsibility for making major decisions. Even if the child primarily lives with one parent, both must collaborate and agree on important issues. Courts often favor this setup unless there's evidence that it would harm the child, such as a history of conflict or abuse.

• Sole Legal Custody: Here, only one parent has the right to make these decisions. This might be awarded if one parent is deemed unfit, absent, or if joint decision-making isn't feasible due to high levels of parental discord.

• Modified Joint Legal Custody: In some cases, parents share decision-making but with one having final say in specific areas, like education or medical care.​

 

Physical custody, sometimes called residential custody in New York, pertains to where the child lives on a daily basis and who handles their routine care. It determines the child's primary residence and the time spent with each parent. Like legal custody, physical custody can be joint or sole:​

 

• Joint Physical Custody: The child splits time roughly equally between both parents' homes. This requires parents to live relatively close to each other and cooperate on logistics, such as school drop-offs and extracurricular activities. It's not always a strict 50/50 split but aims for substantial time with both parents.

• Sole Physical Custody: The child lives with one parent the vast majority of the time, making that parent the "custodial parent." The other parent, known as the "non-custodial parent," typically has visitation rights, which could include weekends, holidays, and vacations.

​

For more information, please see our blog post titled Legal Custody vs. Physical Custody: What’s the Difference?

​​​

How Courts Decide Custody​​​​​​

In New York State, custody decisions determined by application the “best interests of the child” standard. To determine what is in the best interests of the child, courts look at a range of factors to decide which arrangement will best support the child’s welfare, stability, and development. Courts are to consider the totality of the circumstances, with no one factor being automatically determinative. Some of the primary factors considered include: 

​​​

• Parental Fitness and Ability, which includes each parent’s physical and mental health, ability to provide for the child’s emotional and intellectual development, and any substance abuse, domestic violence, or neglect issues that may be present

• Stability of the Home Environment, which includes who has been the child’s primary caregiver, the quality of each parent’s home environment, and the need for stability and continuity in the child’s life.

• Parent-Child Relationship, which includes the emotional bond between the child and each parent, the willingness of each parent to foster a positive relationship with the other parent, and evidence of alienation or attempts to undermine the other parent.

• Parental Cooperation, which considers each parent’s ability to communicate and co-parent effectively and whether joint legal custody is realistic under the circumstances.

• Child’s Wishes, which takes on increased weight as the child ages.

​​​

Additionally, courts will consider other practical considerations such as each parent’s work schedule and availability to care for the child, the geographic proximity of the parents’ homes, and the presence of siblings in either home.​​​​​​​​​​

​​​​​​​

Parenting plans should be carefully tailored to your unique situation. This can involve any number of situations. For instance, questions often arise over a new partner's access to the children. For more on this particular situation see our blog post. Can I Keep My Ex’s New Partner Away From Our Children? Understanding the Legal Factors That Matter in New York State

​​​​​​

The Impact of Mental Health on Custody Determinations

New York courts prioritize the child's well-being above all else in custody disputes. The "best interests" standard requires judges to weigh a variety of factors to determine what arrangement will best support the child's emotional, physical, and psychological development. While mental health can be one key element, it is not viewed in isolation. Instead, courts assess how a parent's mental condition affects their ability to provide a stable, nurturing environment.

 

For instance, emotional instability, mood disorders, or untreated mental illnesses can weigh against a parent if they impair caregiving. However, a diagnosis alone isn't grounds for denying custody. New York law emphasizes that a mental health issue must have a direct "nexus" to the child's best interests, meaning it has to have a demonstratable adverse impact on the child's well-being. This approach reflects a growing recognition of mental health as a manageable aspect of life, rather than an automatic disqualification.

​

To learn more please see our blog post titled The Impact of Mental Health on Custody Determinations in New York State

​

Use of Psychiatric Evaluations​

A psychiatric evaluation is a professional assessment performed by a licensed mental health professional. The evaluator’s job is to assess the mental and emotional condition of one or both parents, and, in some cases, the child, to help the court understand how those factors may impact parenting ability, decision-making, and the child’s well-being.

​​

These evaluations differ from standard therapy or counseling. The evaluator does not provide treatment but instead prepares a written report for the court or attorneys involved in the case. The report may include:​

 

• A summary of interviews with the parents and child

• Psychological testing results

• Observations of parent-child interactions

• Professional opinions about each parent’s ability to meet the child’s needs

​​

Courts don't order these evaluations in every custody case; they're reserved for situations where there's significant conflict or concern. Common triggers include:

​​

• Allegations of mental illness, substance abuse, domestic violence, or instability;

• A parent exhibits erratic, aggressive, or concerning behavior;

• The child shows signs of emotional distress linked to a parent’s conduct;

• The court needs expert insight to evaluate the child’s safety or developmental needs;

• High levels of parental conflict;

• Suspected parental alienation, where one parent may be influencing the child against the other.​​

 

A judge may order an evaluation on their own initiative (sua sponte), at the request of a parent, or based on a recommendation from the attorney for the child. The evaluator’s findings are not binding, but they often carry significant weight. Judges in New York may consider the evaluator’s recommendations alongside testimony, documents, and other evidence presented at trial.

​

For more information, please see our blog post titled The Use of Psychiatric Evaluations in Child Custody Matters

​

The Impact of Domestic Violence Allegations

New York law explicitly requires judges to factor in domestic violence when deciding custody and visitation. The key statute is New York Domestic Relations Law (DRL) § 240(1)(a), which mandates that courts consider the "effect of such domestic violence upon the best interests of the child" if allegations are proven by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning it's more likely than not that the abuse occurred). This applies to both initial custody determinations and modifications, ensuring ongoing protection for children.

​

For more information on the impact of domestic violence on custody determinations please see our blog post titled The Impact of Domestic Violence Allegations on Custody Determinations in New York State

​

What Is Parental Alienation?

Parental alienation is a serious form of emotional manipulation where one parent systematically damages the bond between the child and the other parent. Parental alienation occurs when one parent manipulates or pressures a child to reject, fear, or show hostility toward the other parent, often without legitimate justification. This can take many forms, such as:​

 

• Making negative comments about the other parent in front of the child

• Limiting or interfering with visitation or communication

• Creating false narratives about neglect or abuse

• Forcing the child to side with one parent over the other and/or rewarding them for doing so

​​

In New York, custody determinations are based on the best interests of the child. When a court finds evidence that one parent has intentionally tried to alienate the child from the other, it can weigh heavily against that parent. The courts have consistently held that a parent’s willingness to foster a positive relationship between the child and the other parent is a key factor in determining custody. Alienating behavior can lead to a loss or reduction of custody for the offending parent.

​

For more please see our blog post titled Parental Alienation in Custody Determinations

​

Modifying An Existing Custody Order

An existing custody order may be modified upon mutual agreement of the parties or a court determining that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred since the last order and that a modification of the order would be in the child’s best interests. Examples of what courts may consider to be substantial change in circumstances include:

​​​

• The relocation of a parent (especially if it impacts school, visitation, or relationships).

• The custodial parent interfering with visitation or not following the existing order.

• Evidence of domestic violence, substance abuse, or neglect.

• A significant change to a parent’s work schedule or living situation.

• The child has expressed a strong preference for a different arrangement.

​

For more information, please see our blog post titled Modifying Child Custody Orders in New York: What You Need to Know

​​​​​​​​

Relocation​

In New York, if you have a custody order and wish to relocate with your child in a way that would significantly impact the other parent’s access to the child you must typically seek court approval or the other parent’s consent. If the other parent agrees to the relocation, you can formalize the agreement through a written stipulation or modified custody order. If the other parent objects, you must file a petition with the court to modify the custody order and permit the relocation.

​

Relocation cases in New York, like all custody matters, are evaluate based on what is in the child’s best interests. However, there is an added layer of analysis in relocation cases guided by the landmark case Tropea v. Tropea (1996), and according known as Tropea Factors, which include:

​

• Reason for the Move: Courts assess whether the relocation is for a legitimate purpose, such as a job opportunity, better living conditions, or family support, versus an intent to interfere with the other parent’s relationship with the child.

• Impact on the Child: The court considers how the move affects the child’s emotional, educational, and social well-being, including access to quality schools, healthcare, and community ties.

• Impact on the Non-Custodial Parent: Courts evaluate whether the move significantly disrupts the non-custodial parent’s visitation or relationship with the child. A proposed parenting plan that maintains meaningful contact (e.g., extended visits, virtual communication) can help.

• Quality of Life Improvements: The court may consider whether the relocation offers financial, educational, or emotional benefits for the child and custodial parent.

• Child’s Wishes: Depending on the child’s age and maturity, their preference may be considered.

• History of Parental Involvement: The court examines each parent’s role in the child’s life and whether the move supports or undermines those relationships.

​

You must demonstrate that the relocation serves the child’s best interests. The court may hold a hearing to review evidence, such as financial records, school information, or testimony about the proposed move’s benefits and drawbacks. Relocation cases are fact-specific. For example, moving within New York may face less scrutiny than moving out of state or internationally. Long-distance moves may require adjustments to visitation schedules or transportation cost arrangements.

​

Relocation cases are complex and require careful preparation. Consulting an experienced New York family law attorney is essential to navigate the legal process and protect your rights. Contact our office to discuss your specific situation and options.

​

To learn more about the factors a court may consider in determining whether you can relocate with a child see our blog post on Understanding Child Custody Relocation Petitions in New York

​

The Role of the Attorney for the Child

In New York State custody cases, an Attorney for the Child (AFC), formerly known as a law guardian, is a court-appointed lawyer tasked with representing the child’s best interests and preferences. The AFC ensures the child’s voice is heard in custody and visitation disputes, particularly when parents disagree. Here’s an overview:

​

• Advocacy for the Child: The AFC’s primary role is to advocate for the child’s best interests, which may not always align with the parents’ positions. They investigate the child’s circumstances, including their living situation, relationships with parents, and emotional well-being.

• Gathering Information: The AFC interviews the child (considering their age and maturity) and call also interview parents, and relevant individuals (e.g., teachers, therapists) at their discretion, but are not required to. They may also review documents like school records or medical reports to understand the child’s needs and preferences.

• Expressing the Child’s Wishes: If the child is old enough to express a reasoned preference, the AFC conveys those wishes to the court. However, the AFC is not required to advocate for the child’s preferences. If an AFC believes a child's wishes conflict with their best interests they may substitute their judgement for the child's.

• Court Participation: The AFC participates in all court proceedings, and can present evidence, question witnesses, and make recommendations to the judge about custody, visitation, or other issues affecting the child. They act as an independent voice, separate from the parents’ attorneys.

• Neutral Role: Unlike the parents’ attorneys, who advocate for their clients’ goals, the AFC remains neutral regarding the parents’ interests, focusing solely on the child’s welfare. This may include recommending arrangements that prioritize stability, safety, or the child’s emotional health.

• Impact on the Case: The AFC’s recommendations can carry significant weight, as judges value their independent perspective. However, the court makes the final decision based on all evidence and the child’s best interests. For this reason, parents should cooperate with the AFC provide relevant information and respect their role while following the guidance of their attorney. 

​

For more information and tips on interacting with the attorney for the child please see our blog post on Understanding the Role of the Attorney for the Child in New York State Custody Matters.

​

What Role Does the Child's Wishes Play?

The wishes of the child are one of the many factors that are considered in a "best interests" analysis", however, they are not determinative. Courts recognize that children may have valid insights into their own needs, yet judges must balance these against other evidence to ensure the decision prioritizes long-term welfare over short-term desires.

 

New York courts do take a child's preferences into account, especially if the child is deemed mature enough to express a reasoned opinion. However, there is no magic age at which a child's wishes become binding. Instead, the court assesses the child's age, maturity, and ability to make independent decisions free from parental influence.

 

For younger children, their preferences may carry little to no weight, as they are often seen as more susceptible to manipulation or unable to fully understand the implications. In contrast, teenagers tend to have their views given more consideration. For instance, a 16-year-old's preference might influence the outcome more significantly than a 7-year-olds, but even then, it's weighed against the totality of circumstances.

 

It's important to note that while a child's input is valued, the court will disregard it if it appears coerced or not aligned with their best interests. Case law emphasizes that no single factor, including the child's wishes, should dominate the decision.

​

For more information on how the wishes of the child play into custody determinations in New York State please see our blog post titled How Much Do a Child's Wishes Matter in New York Custody Cases?

​

Children with Special Needs

Special needs refer to any condition that requires additional support beyond typical child-rearing. In New York, this includes disabilities that impact daily life, such as mobility issues, communication barriers, or the need for ongoing therapies like speech, occupational, or behavioral interventions.

​​

In New York State family law, cases involving children with special needs require a nuanced approach to ensure the child's well-being is prioritized. Special needs can encompass a wide range of conditions, including physical disabilities, developmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disabilities, emotional challenges, or chronic medical issues. These cases often arise in divorce, custody disputes, or support modifications, where standard arrangements may not suffice. Courts focus on the "best interests of the child" standard, but with added emphasis on stability, access to specialized care, and long-term planning.​

 

For example, conditions like ASD often involve sensitivity to routine changes, which can heighten anxiety during parental transitions. Recognizing these needs early in a case allows for tailored legal strategies, ensuring arrangements support the child's growth and independence.​

​

To learn more about the ways in which having a child with special needs may impact a custody determination, please see our blog post titled Special Considerations in Custody Cases Involving Children with Special Needs

​

How is Jurisdiction Determined if the Parents Live in Different States?​​​

When parents live in different states, custody disputes can quickly become complicated. To avoid conflicting custody orders and prevent “forum shopping” between states, custody jurisdiction is governed by a uniform law adopted across the country: the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). New York follows the UCCJEA in determining where custody cases should be heard.

​

For a more detailed look at how jurisdiction is determined in interstate cases, please see our blog post titled Navigating Child Custody Jurisdiction When Parents Live in Different States

​​​

How is Venue Determined if the Parties Live in Different Counties?​​​​​

Even when both parents and the child reside in New York, jurisdictional disputes may arise if the parents live in different counties. In these cases, the issue is not jurisdiction, since New York as a state has authority, but venue, which determines the appropriate county court to hear the case. The court typically prioritizes the county where the child primarily resides, as this is where the most relevant evidence about the child’s life (e.g., school records, medical history, and community ties) is located. However, venue can also be established in:

​

• The county where either parent resides, if the child does not have a clear primary residence.

• A county deemed more convenient by the court, based on factors like the location of witnesses, evidence, or the child’s best interests.

​

For example, if a child splits time between parents in two different counties, the court may select the county where the child spends the most time or where the case can be most efficiently resolved. Courts have discretion to transfer venue if another county is more appropriate, especially to avoid undue hardship for the parties or witnesses. A motion to change venue can be filed if one parent believes the chosen county is inconvenient or improper.

What is Emancipation?

​Emancipation refers to the legal release of a minor from parental control, meaning the child is treated as an adult for certain purposes, such as making decisions about their living arrangements, finances, and education. In New York, parents are generally required to provide financial support to their children until the age of 21, unless the child becomes emancipated earlier. Emancipation ends this obligation, but it also means the minor assumes full responsibility for their own support and well-being. Once emancipated, a child may lose certain protections but gains independence in managing their affairs. It's important to distinguish that New York defines a minor as someone under 18 for most purposes, but the support obligation extends to 21. Emancipation can occur before 21 under specific circumstances, but it's not automatic and must often be proven in court.

 

New York does not have a dedicated statute or formal court process solely for emancipating minors. Instead, emancipation is typically recognized during related legal proceedings. Courts evaluate emancipation on a case-by-case basis, considering factors like the minor's age, living situation, and financial independence. Here are the primary ways a minor may be considered emancipated:​

 

• Marriage: If the minor gets married, they are generally emancipated. However, since 2017, no one under 17 can marry in New York, and those aged 17 must obtain parental and court consent.

• Military Service: Enlisting in the armed forces typically results in emancipation.

• Economic Independence: A minor over 16 who lives separately from their parents, supports themselves through full-time employment (not seasonal jobs), and receives no financial help from parents may be deemed emancipated. Living away for college doesn't count if the plan is to return home.

• Constructive Emancipation: This occurs if a minor of employable age (usually over 16) voluntarily leaves home without good cause, refuses to follow reasonable parental rules, and rejects parental contact. In such cases, the court may rule that the minor has forfeited their right to support. However, if the departure is due to abuse or other valid reasons, the parent may still owe support.

• Abandonment by Parents: In some cases, if parents have effectively abandoned the child, a court may find emancipation.

 

Importantly, emancipation is not automatic simply because a minor moves out or disagrees with their parents. The court will look at whether the minor is genuinely self-supporting and acting independently.​​​

​

Contact Us Today​​​​​

Custody is personal. You need an attorney who takes the time to understand your story, explain your options, and stand up for what matters most. Contact me today to schedule a confidential consultation with an experienced Syracuse child custody attorney.

​

For more details on some of the most commonly asked questions regarding custody matters in New York State please visit our Frequently Asked Questions page

​

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this site or contacting us through it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.